Skip links

A Non-Competition Clause Is No Longer Allowed in a Fixed Term Contract

Despite their different positions, the two Commissioners cited the legislative policy of the Federal Government and the Länder on non-compete obligations. These efforts include a federal bill introduced by Senators Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Todd Young (R-IN) – the Labour Mobility Act – that would eliminate the use of non-compete clauses in employment contracts, with a few exceptions to break partnerships and sell businesses. „Non-compete obligations stifle wage growth, career advancement, innovation and business creation,“ said Senator Young. „A comprehensive reform of the non-compete obligation will empower our workers and entrepreneurs to freely use their talents where their skills are most in demand. An analysis of Carson Palmer`s predicament has implications beyond the world of professional football. While few employers have employment contracts as detailed as those used in professional sports, other employers may see the departure of a key employee in the same way bengals president Mike Brown saw Carson Palmer`s announcement. Employers may ask the following question: If a key employee leaves without notice and there is no formal written „non-compete agreement“, is the employer completely hopeless of preventing the employee who leaves from working for someone else? Before answering this question, it is important to consider all agreements between the employer and the departing employee, not just the specific „non-compete obligations“. One agreement that could affect such a scenario is a fixed-term employment contract. The standard rule in U.S. labor law is „all-you-can-eat employment.“ According to the common law, as applied in most states, the standard rule is that the employment relationship is „at will“ and that the employer or employee can terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason (or no reason). Of course, a number of state and federal laws and court decisions have created exceptions to this „standard rule,“ exceptions that limit an employer`s ability to act.

For example, while an employer may terminate an employee`s employment relationship „for any reason,“ the employer cannot terminate the employment relationship for reasons that have been declared illegal by law (for example. B, under the Federal Title VII Act, an employer cannot terminate the employment relationship on the basis of an employee`s race, colour, religion, sex or national origin). While an employer can terminate an employee`s employment relationship „at any time,“ bylaws may require some dismissal prior to certain dismissals (p.B., the federal WARN Act requires 60 days` notice before employees can be fired as a result of a „plant closure“ or „mass layoff“ as defined in the law). Even employees without a non-compete obligation are bound by certain rules after their dismissal. These employees may not systematically approach your customers after the end of the employment relationship. Our lawyers will be happy to advise you further. For which positions and employees do you really need a non-competition clause to protect your company`s trade secrets, goodwill and confidential information (given that non-compete obligations with low-wage workers, employees who do not have access to trade secrets, and employees who are unlikely to attract customers to a competitor are now more easily audited)? Since 1 January 2015, it is no longer permissible to include a non-compete obligation in a fixed-term contract. An exception can only apply because of important interests of the company. Please consult our lawyers for more details. Fans of professional football may remember the predicament that former Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer found himself in at the start of the 2011 season. Prior to the season, Palmer announced that he no longer wanted to play for the Bengals. Not surprisingly, the Bengals took him at his word and Palmer didn`t play for the Bengals in 2011.

More surprisingly, however, seems that the Bengals have not transferred Palmer to another team. Palmer instead did not play for any team in the first half of the 2011 season — as reported by the Cincinnati Enquirer on July 27, 2011, Bengals president Mike Brown said, „Carson signed a contract, he made a commitment. He gave us his word and we relied on his word and his commitment. If he deviates from his commitment, we will not reward him for it. It wasn`t until October 2011 that the Bengals finally released Palmer from his contract and traded him to the Oakland Raiders. Your employee could ask the District Court if the non-competition clauses in the contract are really necessary and legitimate. If you do not properly justify the non-compete obligation, the District Court may annul the clauses. You can determine what should be included in the non-compete obligation.

It may contain provisions such as: Non-compete obligations may constitute a substantial restriction on an employee`s freedom of choice in the workplace, so they are only valid and enforceable under certain restrictions. It depends. First, look at the terms of the non-compete obligation itself. Is this a termination? Assuming that is the case — and he says that the non-competition clause still applies even if you are fired — the next question is: Is it legal? Again, the answer is: it depends…